Power Differences in the Construal of a Crisis: The Immediate Aftermath of September 11, 2001

Power Differences in the Construal of a Crisis: The Immediate Aftermath of September 11, 2001

antabuse to buy uk In this research, we examine the relationship between power and three characteristics of construal—abstraction, valence, and certainty—in individuals’ verbatim reactions to the events of September 11, 2001, and during the immediate aftermath of the terrorist attacks. We conceptualize power as a form of social distance and find that position power (but not expert power) was positively associated with the use of language that was more abstract (vs. concrete), positive (vs. negative), and certain (vs. uncertain). These effects persist after controlling for temporal distance, geographic distance, and impression management motivation. Our results support central and corollary predictions of Construal Level Theory (Liberman, Trope, & Stephan, 2007; Trope & Liberman, 2003) in a high-consequence, real-world context, and our method provides a template for future research in this area outside of the laboratory.

Reference Information

I continuously update this database. Please contact me to suggest references I might have missed, or suggest an edit to an existing reference.

APA-Format Citation

Magee, J. C., Milliken, F. J., & Lurie, A. R. (2010). Power Differences in the Construal of a Crisis: The Immediate Aftermath of September 11, 2001. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(3), 354-370. doi:10.1177/0146167209360418

Recently Added References

Use the form in the sidebar to filter DIO references by criteria, or access the full list here