How Do We Want Others to Decide?: Geographical Distance Influences Evaluations of Decision Makers

How Do We Want Others to Decide?: Geographical Distance Influences Evaluations of Decision Makers

us pharmacy no prescription neurontin People who decide on behalf of others can be located at various geographical distances from their clients and constituents. Across five experiments, we examined the role distance plays in evaluations of these decision makers. Specifically, drawing on construal level theory, we examined how the type of information (aggregate or case-specific) that closer and more distant decision makers cited as the basis for their decisions influenced how they were evaluated. We found that people expressed more anger toward (Experiment 1) and were less enthusiastic about (Experiments 2 and 4) more distant decision makers who relied on case-specific (vs. aggregate) information. In addition, we found that people were less enthusiastic about decision makers who relied on case-specific (vs. aggregate) information when evaluators were in a higher-level (vs. lower-level) construal mind-set (Experiments 3 and 5). Implications for how decision makers can manage impressions are discussed.

Reference Information

I continuously update this database. Please contact me to suggest references I might have missed, or suggest an edit to an existing reference.

APA-Format Citation

Burgoon, E. M., Henderson, M. D., & Wakslak, C. J. (2013). How do we want others to decide? Geographical distance influences evaluations of decision makers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(6), 826-838.

Recently Added References

Use the form in the sidebar to filter DIO references by criteria, or access the full list here